Monday, 12 March 2012
Saturday, 14 May 2011
Of Warm Hands and Sympathetic Clefts
It always begins in a souring. Overanxious types show up, hands slip down and go up unsympathetic clefts, overripe melons burst in the corners, and I . . . I am always there with my big, rough tongue to lick it, souring and all.
Saturday, 26 June 2010
On Progress.
I see no evidence of progress in the machines of men.
The wheel is only a breast that rotates freely.
Fire is only a penis regrettably caught in an immortal moment of ejaculation.
Shelter eats you but does not kill you. It is a womb.
Expressed beauty is only a cry for help.
Tuesday, 1 June 2010
Extract No. 3
The book is titled 'Of Gods and the Like' after a bit of fantastic word-buggering of Spinoza's fabulous Ethics's first part 'Of God.' It is likely I am revising this next bit while you read. The incoherence might frustrate but it is difficult to revise the entire book every time I inject an idea in somewhere. The following bit is the very beginning, which like a funky succubus is still sucking away at the firmness of my ideation after the three years since I started writing for it. Mating Gods with distastefulness might seem distasteful but if it is to be done, I will do it gracefully. This perhaps is more important to me than my squandered supply of love. If you must swear at and curse my ineptitude at impotency, go ahead and include me in your process but keep away from metal penises and do read on for I love you o reader for your act of reading more than you could hate me for whatever it is that I have done to you. Do return. I update frequently.
Sunday, 16 May 2010
About the Hyenas
The hyenas of war should get fucked and their assholes should be ripped out. The thing is, the mouth needs bones but the asshole does not. Let the hyenas fart all they want with naked pelvic girdles. We will not hallucinate on their fart again and believe them. The hyenas know they cannot use their faces to speak to us because faces are in general ill-equipped to hide the mind's intent. Greed readily translates into slobbering and slobbering is much worse than sweating under pressure which can be misinterpreted as a good thing.
Posted by
Nikhil
at
19:52
12
comments
Labels: Allegory, Angst, Happy Endings, Rambling, Rants
Saturday, 15 May 2010
An Indictment of Organized Sport
My views on organized sport are similar to my views on organized religion and God knows I don't think much of organized religion. . . (a subsequent "not!" would be too trite to actually make obvious.) I could start with statistics to show how wasteful institutionalized sport is. But I'd rather start with a little quoted quote from a much quoted monologue.
And what is that which I ought to pay or to receive? What shall be done to the man who has never had the wit to be idle during his whole life; but has been careless of what the many care about - wealth, and family interests, and military offices, and speaking in the assembly, and magistracies, and plots, and parties. Reflecting that I was really too honest a man to follow in this way and live, I did not go where I could do no good to you or to myself; but where I could do the greatest good privately to everyone of you, thither I went . . . What shall be done to such a one? Doubtless some good thing, O men of Athens, if he has his reward; and the good should be of a kind suitable to him . . . There can be no more fitting reward than maintenance in the Prytaneum, O men of Athens, a reward which he deserves far more than the citizen who has won the prize at Olympia in the horse or chariot race, whether the chariots were drawn by two horses or by many. For I am in want, and he has enough; and he only gives you the appearance of happiness, and I give you the reality. And if I am to estimate the penalty justly, I say that maintenance in the Prytaneum is the just return.There is no need to say this is from The Apology of Socrates but I do anyway. Let us assume for the sake of the argument that happiness perhaps can be measured in dollars. Then it is not enough to question the purpose served by the trillions we pour into the coffers of sports teams, their managers, and that many-headed hydra called Marketing because we could point to the questioning of why we should do anything really. Instead, we should, like we should whenever in doubt . . .
Whenever you are in doubt, or when the self becomes too much with you, apply the following test. Recall the face of the poorest and the weakest man whom you may have seen, and ask yourself, if the step you contemplate is going to be of any use to him. Will he gain anything by it? Will it restore him to a control over his own life and destiny? In other words, will it lead to swaraj [freedom] for the hungry and spiritually starving millions? Then you will find your doubts and your self melt away.Gandhi's talisman is not without merit and it is just far too easy to not worry about the world not forced regularly down our optical tubing. Far too easy. Another quote and one that describes Gandhi becomes necessary:
It is alarming and also nauseating to see Mr. Gandhi, a seditious Middle Temple lawyer, now posing as a fakir of a type well known in the East, striding half-naked up the steps of the viceregal palace, while he is still organizing and conducting a defiant campaign of civil disobedience, to parley on equal terms with the representative of the King-Emperor.Churchill's comment is with less merit but serves its purpose well. Why does it take a Middle Temple lawyer to make a Gandhi? Mohandas was not exactly a carpenter's son. It is convenient to imagine the human race conjured up the first bourgeois whores in 18th century France. But that is sadly not true. We have to take what we can get in way of enlightened individuals. The bourgeois do not treat the message as a message but as a metaphor for loss, gain, pain, pleasure, and sacrifice; specifically what the individual had to endure to make the message. Thus their eyes turn Gautama Buddha into a generous and self-sacrificing Prince Siddhartha. Churchill, the embodiment of the British bourgeoisie, does something similar. The capitalist whore will deride socialism for being anti-intellectualist and yet will fear the intelligent individual.
This fear gives rise to organized sport to fulfill the desire of always having something to do.
The Socratic method now finds expression only in the fatuous pugilism of debate teams.
Intelligent discourse is made to bow before heated discussions over pointless player statistics. Revolution to talk of revolution and that to the virtue of tax-deductible donations. Pointless rituals to preen the young and teach them the way of the bourgeois.
Money-making is a sport? Gambling is a sport? Sex is sport? What is not trivialized to being sport?
At this point I would like to refer to the Swedish cartoon of Mohammed. I did not see the point. There was none. No artistic merit. By "art," with some teleological bent, I point to the cause of whatever being is.
What has no artistic merit need not be.
Instead we are forced to learn by rote and repeat what earlier versions of us, in their turn, learnt by rote and did. Fire good. Fire bad.
By watching sport, we are returning again and again to the expected unexpected, to the unexpected that strays only within reason. To the comfort of reality tv.
I, for one, would rather watch something with a script.
I would rather live out a scripted story than go through the motions of a pointless expression of my bastard individualism.
I leave with Heraclitus:
No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man.
Sunday, 28 March 2010
Once the Charm of an Absurd Existence is Spent. . .
If I say my life is absurd, it is not because I mean to boast but because I wish to force a reconciliation between my self and my belief in all life being absurd. So I repeat so: my life is absurd.
Oh!
Faking excitement now consumes much of my day. I blame everyone.
I wrote a small little nothing a few months back. It goes like this: "But, most of all, we are what we are not." It meant little back then. A nothing. A something that was just contrary enough to amuse me.
Then, yesterday, I finally realized what my subconscious was trying to tell me. I was talking or walking or eating or whatever-the-fuck-it-is-that-I-do-now and suddenly I realized I do not have a subconsciousness. I do not have a consciousness. I am empty.
I am what the rest of the universe uses to counterpoint itself.
I am where the rest of the universe stores its junk.
I am a non-entity pressed into existence for the sake of the universe.
As soon as I realized what I had realized, I felt the weight of the entire Universe (minus me if it is that I do exist) pressing against me. I suddenly felt extremely inviolable but also extremely unhappy.
Paranoia is a strange and lovable thing but to suddenly come to know that the universe has created me solely for its selfish purpose of continuing its existence is not really anything like the wet dream I remember having about the time I finally figure out the purpose of my being.
Calling it acute claustrophobia is putting this feeling mildly. Claustrophobia--as I see it--relies on the person's knowing that there is a small possibility that the self can explode (or just swell up) to exactly fit the dimensions of the confined space it is in. There is something about joined walls that makes us want to feel them out, to lick them all over, and to have our forms be one with them.
But the Universe? Does it have walls? Can my fear of open spaces be reconciled with my fear of closed spaces? Not bloody likely.
I feel like I will choke on the next breath of air I take.
I am reading Dostoevsky and Kafka again. I remember now the state of feverish excitement my first reading of "Crime and Punishment" brought and also the indifference towards Kafka my first reading of "The Metamorphosis" brought. This time around, I realize why Dostoevsky could read my mind and why I did not care about the problems of Gregor Samsa.
I am the Underground Man and I am Gregor Samsa. I am my novel's hero and I am extremely indifferent to what I say or do.
To pervert what Kafka says: "I am the nihilistic thought that came into my mind."
Posted by
Nikhil
at
01:15
6
comments
Labels: Angst, Grand Unified Theory, Morbidity, Philosophy, Rants, Writing
Saturday, 30 January 2010
Extract No. 4
We think with our limitations. I speak for myself but assume you are not unlike me. There are no absolutes--nothing that can really separate me from you. I think we know this and it bothers us. If we still try to find absolutes with our pessimism, we find we can reduce everything we have ever done to either prostitution or masturbation. Even rape can find a place in the two. But of course this is only for the sake of our pessimism. Prostitution and masturbation are hardly mutually exclusive. Also we are still talking about things we do and not about what we are. We are not prostitutes because we prostitute or masturbators because we masturbate.
When engaging with certain portions of the universe, like when engaging with its vastness, solipsism becomes essential. I have always felt that. The premise that brought me to that conclusion when I was seven was not really the same as when I was dead and twenty seven. Twenty years ago, I felt real people were too hairy to be really real.
Now that I am dead, I must revert to solipsism because non-existence does not make sense. It cannot. The explanation for the non-existent must be non-existent.
Sunday, 10 January 2010
To offend the pious.

The 'net is full of nuts. It is almost like a divine spider-squirrel is gathering them up all and putting them there for the winter to come.
Because he died and it was very poetic.
Posted by
Nikhil
at
13:14
6
comments
Labels: Diary, Morbidity, Philosophy, Rants, Religion and Philosophy



0 comments:
Post a Comment